Compare 5 source-linked mark variants recorded under Hans Hansen. These are reconstructions for comparison, not source photographs or authentication evidence.
5 mark variants·13 weighable lots·3 auction examples·1 cited source
Line reconstructionLineAI-assisted oxidized reconstructionAI oxidized
Drag across the mark to compare L lineO oxidized
Mark variant 1 of 5
Low confidence comparison reconstruction.
Cursive Hans Hansen signature with a long lower underline flourish and no enclosing border.
Other recorded variants
4 variants
LineAI oxidized
Mark variant 2
Low confidence comparison reconstruction.
Interlocked H-within-H monogram with no enclosing border.
LineAI oxidized
Mark variant 3
Low confidence comparison reconstruction.
Cursive Hans Hansen signature variant with its long underline flourish and no enclosing border.
LineAI oxidized
Mark variant 4
Low confidence comparison reconstruction.
Uppercase H, lowercase a, uppercase H wordmark with no visible border.
LineAI oxidized
Mark variant 5
Low confidence comparison reconstruction.
Very small worn HaH-like three-letter mark in left-to-right order inside exactly one narrow rectangular cartouche.
Source record
Source location
Kolding · Kolding/Copenhagen
Source dates
Hans Hansen - Kolding 1930 - 1950 · 4 more source statements
Original source statements:
Hans Hansen - Kolding 1930 - 1950
Hans Hansen - Kolding/Copenhagen 1947 - 1969
Hans Hansen Sølvsmedie - Kolding 1950 - ?
Hans Hansen Sølvsmedie - Kolding 1947 - ?
Hans Hansen - Kolding 1937 - 1947
Market evidence for Hans Hansen
13 lots · 12 houses
1.29–7.95× melt
The middle half of observed sold-price-to-silver-value ratios, from 13 weighable lots across 12 auction houses. Each lot uses the silver reference at its sale date.
Prices remain in their original currencies; buyer-premium inclusion is unknown. These are reviewed maker-name auction examples, not proof of an object's attribution.
This maker-level evidence does not value your object. Matching a mark cannot establish authenticity, material, condition or provenance.
Maker labels and date or location statements follow the cited source records. Similar names across source collections have not been merged. Compare the photographed mark and the complete object before relying on a resemblance.