Tang Yin Auction Prices and Value Guide

Tang Yin auction prices are tracked in Appraisily's artist market index, with source-directory coverage of 569 records. Use this page to review sold-lot activity, market context, and valuation factors before requesting a formal appraisal.

Tang Yin auction prices: quick answer

Tang Yin auction prices depend on medium, size, date, condition, provenance, edition details, attribution confidence, and recent comparable auction sales.

Artist
Tang Yin
Source records
569
Market update
2026-02-16

Tang Yin market snapshot

Tang Yin shows deep auction liquidity with 162 tracked lots. Median realized sale is around $2,000. Category concentration is still broad or sparse. Last 12 months recorded 16 sales. Latest recorded sale: 2026-01-18.

Realized price distribution

  • Under $1,000 (15.4% · 16 sales)
  • $1,000 to $10,000 (47.1% · 49 sales)
  • $10,000+ (37.5% · 39 sales)
Median sale (last 12 months)
$40,000
Sales recorded (last 12 months)
16
Median shift vs prior year
+100.0%
Latest recorded sale
2026-01-18

Artist context

About Tang Yin

Tang Yin portrait
張靈繪 · Public domain · Source

Born

1470

Died

1524

Nationality

Chinese

Also known as

Tang Bohu, Bohu, Ziwei, Liuru Jushi

Tang Yin (1470–1524) was a Chinese painter, calligrapher, and poet active during the Ming dynasty. He is also identified by the courtesy names Bohu and Ziwei, while collected references record Tang Bohu and the brush names Liuru Jushi and Taohua Anzhu. Sources associate him with the Wu school and place him among the Four Masters of the Ming dynasty alongside Shen Zhou, Wen Zhengming, and Qiu Ying. His recorded artistic range includes landscapes, figure and genre subjects, flowers, drawing, and calligraphy, reflecting the breadth of Ming literati practice. Collectors may therefore encounter his name in connection with paintings, works on paper, and calligraphic material. Because several historical name forms are associated with him, careful entity matching is essential when organizing museum references and auction records. The available sources establish Tang Yin's historical identity and broad artistic context, but they do not resolve the attribution or authenticity of any individual object.

Wu schoolPaintingDrawingCalligraphyLandscapesFigures and genre subjectsFlowers

Common works and media

Tang Yin is associated with Chinese painting, drawing, and calligraphy. Reference summaries identify landscapes, figures and genre scenes, and flowers among his subjects. In auction or appraisal settings, these categories should remain distinct: a landscape painting is not directly comparable to a calligraphic work or figure drawing solely because the same artist name appears in the catalogue. Materials, format, dimensions, inscriptions, seals, dating, and catalogued attribution require object-level examination.

Market and appraisal context

An appraisal should first establish what kind of object is being assessed, since painting, drawing, calligraphy, landscape, figure, and flower categories all appear in the collected references. Catalogued name form also matters because Tang Yin is represented by multiple courtesy and brush names. The source pack includes an Appraisily auction-record page but no accessible major-auction-house lot analysis, so it does not support a price forecast or market-direction claim. When public records are available, comparisons should match the work type, subject, dimensions, materials, catalogued attribution, sale date, and auction-house description. Provenance, condition, dating, and attribution must be established from evidence specific to the object rather than inferred from this artist profile.

Auction categories and appraisal factors

Common auction categories

  • Chinese paintings
  • Works on paper and drawings
  • Calligraphy

Value drivers

  1. Work type and medium should be matched when selecting comparable auction records
  2. Subject category, including landscapes, figures, and flowers, can distinguish otherwise dissimilar works
  3. Catalogued artist name and alias matching should account for Tang Yin, Tang Bohu, Bohu, and Ziwei
  4. Comparable public auction records should be evaluated by sale date, realized price, work type, and the auction house's catalogued attribution

Appraisal caveats

  • The collected source pack contains an Appraisily auction-record signal but no accessible major-auction-house biography or object-level lot evidence.
  • No price prediction or market-trend conclusion is supported by this source pack.
  • Object-level attribution, provenance, condition, materials, dimensions, and dating require evidence beyond this artist identity profile.
  • The large separation between the artist's lifetime and modern sales makes precise catalogued attribution especially important, but this pack does not provide attribution guidance.

Evidence

Sources for artist context

This source-grounded artist context is based on collected public records: medium confidence, adequate source quality.

Source-grounded artist Markdown

Data basis

This page is built from Appraisily's public auction market index. Private transactions, incomplete sale feeds, and attribution changes may not be fully represented.

LLM-readable Markdown summary for Tang Yin

LLM summary index · LLM full index

Artist value FAQ

How much is Tang Yin worth?

Comparable public auction sales are the best starting point, but final value depends on the specific artwork, condition, size, medium, provenance, and attribution confidence.

Can Appraisily value my Tang Yin artwork?

Yes. Appraisily can review photos, dimensions, signatures, condition, provenance, and comparable market data to prepare a current valuation.