David (1610) Teniers Auction Prices and Value Guide

David (1610) Teniers auction prices are tracked in Appraisily's artist market index, with source-directory coverage of 1,865 records. Use this page to review sold-lot activity, market context, and valuation factors before requesting a formal appraisal.

David (1610) Teniers auction prices: quick answer

David (1610) Teniers auction prices depend on medium, size, date, condition, provenance, edition details, attribution confidence, and recent comparable auction sales.

Artist
David (1610) Teniers
Source records
1,865
Market update
2026-02-16

David (1610) Teniers market snapshot

David (1610) Teniers shows solid auction liquidity with 70 tracked lots. Median realized sale is around $3,250. Category concentration is still broad or sparse. Last 12 months recorded 2 sales. Latest recorded sale: 2025-09-09.

Realized price distribution

  • Under $1,000 (17.8% · 8 sales)
  • $1,000 to $10,000 (55.6% · 25 sales)
  • $10,000+ (26.7% · 12 sales)
Median sale (last 12 months)
$44,450
Sales recorded (last 12 months)
2
Median shift vs prior year
+100.0%
Latest recorded sale
2025-09-09

Artist context

About David (1610) Teniers

David (1610) Teniers portrait
Philip Fruytiers · Public domain · Source

David (1610) Teniers is the auction-directory name attached to a substantial group of public sale records, but the supplied research material does not establish the historical identity behind that label with institution-grade biographical evidence. The name may refer to David Teniers the Younger, whose dates are commonly presented as 1610–1690, yet that identification should not be treated as confirmed from this source pack alone. Collectors may encounter objects catalogued under this name in fine-art, works-on-paper, mixed-media, and decorative-art categories. Those broad classifications can also contain workshop pieces, later copies, prints, or works carrying qualified attributions. Before presenting a biography or assigning a work to a specific Teniers, the artist identity, catalogue wording, authorship level, and object type should therefore be checked against museum, scholarly, and provenance records.

Common works and media

The current auction index groups material under fine art and paintings, works on paper and prints, sculpture and mixed media, and decorative art and editions. These are broad database categories rather than a verified catalogue of the artist’s oeuvre. For appraisal work, the object’s actual medium, date, authorship wording, inscriptions, edition status, and relationship to any original composition should be established before selecting comparable sales.

Market and appraisal context

Appraisily’s matched public-auction data covers sales reported between 2002 and 2025, with 62 records and 38 priced results in the supplied page snapshot. The observed range is broad, so a single median or headline result should not be treated as an appraisal. Relevant comparisons should align as closely as possible on medium, dimensions, date, subject, condition, restoration, provenance, inscriptions, and attribution language. Catalogue distinctions such as “by,” “attributed to,” “workshop of,” “circle of,” “after,” or “manner of” can materially change which records are comparable. Reported auction totals may also differ in their treatment of buyer’s premium and fees, while private sales and incomplete feeds remain outside or only partly represented.

Auction categories and appraisal factors

Common auction categories

  • Fine art and paintings
  • Works on paper and prints
  • Sculpture and mixed media
  • Decorative art and editions

Value drivers

  1. Medium, dimensions, date, and period represented by the work
  2. Condition, restoration history, and surface quality
  3. Signature, inscriptions, edition details, and confidence in the attribution
  4. Provenance, exhibition history, and references in recognized catalogues
  5. Comparable public auction results for works similar in type and characteristics
  6. Subject matter, rarity, and current market demand

Evidence

Sources for artist context

This source-grounded artist context is based on collected public records: low confidence, thin source quality.

Source-grounded artist Markdown

Data basis

This page is built from Appraisily's public auction market index. Private transactions, incomplete sale feeds, and attribution changes may not be fully represented.

LLM-readable Markdown summary for David (1610) Teniers

LLM summary index · LLM full index

Artist value FAQ

How much is David (1610) Teniers worth?

Comparable public auction sales are the best starting point, but final value depends on the specific artwork, condition, size, medium, provenance, and attribution confidence.

Can Appraisily value my David (1610) Teniers artwork?

Yes. Appraisily can review photos, dimensions, signatures, condition, provenance, and comparable market data to prepare a current valuation.